linux-kernel - Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48F897ED.1060206@sandeen.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:49:33 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Tobias Frost <tobi@...dtobi.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	debian-arm@...ts.debian.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
>>> So is this a regression?  did it used to work?  If so, when? :)
>> The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
>> I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger
>> the bug.  So it's not a (recent) regression.
> 
> As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a 
> regression. XFS never worked on arm for me.

Ok; I think there are probably a few problems, so trying to keep them
straight.  I at least had xfs working properly in a qemu arm emulator a
few weeks ago... :)

> If you need tests on old ABI just tell me.
> 

ok, thanks!

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/