linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add Dallas DS1390 RTC chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200810170829.06699.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:29:06 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Mark Jackson <mpfj@...c.co.uk>
Cc:	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Dallas DS1390 RTC chip

On Friday 17 October 2008, Mark Jackson wrote:
> >> +    /* Can tx_buf and rx_buf be equal? The doc in spi.h is not sure... */
> >> +    xfer.tx_buf = chip->tx_buf;
> >> +    xfer.rx_buf = chip->rx_buf;
> > 
> >  you use the same buffer a few functions below. either
> >  one way or the other. please investigate with the spi subsystem maintainer.
> 
> David,
> 
> Just to double check (as per Alessandro's suggestion), is this okay use of the 
> spi buffers ?

Yes.  That comment deserves to be updated.

SPI does bi-directional I/O, and the underlying controller
should be able to just replace the contents of a buffer
with a spi_transfer that uses the same rx and tx buffers.

- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/