[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F8B833.7080807@harris.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:07:15 -0400
From: "Steven A. Falco" <sfalco@...ris.com>
To: avorontsov@...mvista.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, i2c@...sensors.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 RFC] Handle I2C GPIO controllers with the OF (was:
pca9539 I2C gpio expander)
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently there was a question about I2C GPIO controllers and how should
> we handle them with the OpenFirmware and such.
>
> Here is the attempt to "connect" I2C GPIO controllers to the
> "OpenFirmware" device tree, without writing an OF-specific bindings
> for each driver.
>
> The salt is in these two patches:
>
> [PATCH 3/7] of: fill the archdata for I2C devices
> ^ Here we're storing the device tree node into the I2C device.
>
> [PATCH 5/7] of/gpio: implement of_dev_gpiochip_{add,remove} calls
> ^ And here we extracting the the stored node to put the registered
> of_gpio_chip into that node.
>
>
> How does it look?
I've just tested this with a pca9539 chip attached to my Sequoia board,
and it works perfectly for me. I don't have the mcu_mpc8349emitx.c file
in my tree, so I was not able to apply part 7 of 7, but the rest looks
fine. Thanks for doing this.
Acked by: Steve Falco <sfalco@...ris.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists