linux-kernel - Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4423d670810170954h7ca130aaw8895380a4c6b125@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:54:35 +0400
From:	"Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@...il.com>
To:	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)

2008/10/17 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:43:07PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> It is SMP x86_64, rootfs is on XFS
>
> The message comes from code in XFS, but I really wonder where the atomic
> context comes from.  xfs_iget_core has a few changes in the tree pulled
> into todays Linux-next, but it's still missing the recent updates
> redoing this area completely.  In some ways it looks like this process
> has the the atomic context flag left pending somewhere, but that should
> also trigger warnings on the VFS locks like i_mutex.
>
> Very misterious.
>
> IS there a specific workload you can reproduce this with?
>
Workload is not specific, many i/o commands trigger the message.

 dmesg|grep comm:
[    4.419605] Pid: 1396, comm: mkdir Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[    6.056443] Pid: 1782, comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[   17.899905] Pid: 1791, comm: dhcpcd-run-hook Not tainted
2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 3846.588549] Pid: 2005, comm: screen Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 4416.242723] Pid: 2023, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 4430.618037] Pid: 2023, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 4431.641578] Pid: 2023, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 4432.944265] Pid: 2023, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[ 4590.330706] Pid: 2026, comm: git-merge Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[14882.802479] Pid: 2058, comm: git-merge Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[16955.026436] Pid: 2091, comm: git-merge Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[18466.645935] Pid: 2119, comm: git-merge Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
[19165.813049] Pid: 2150, comm: git-merge Not tainted 2.6.27-next-20081017 #2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/