linux-kernel - Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:10 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
 kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:37:10 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> I just ran the xfs testsuite over linux-next on qemu (i386), and I
> can't find anything at all.  Really strange.  Let's see if this still
> there with mondays linux-next, and if yes can you just try the xfs
> patch from the splitout linux-next patches and see if that alone
> causes it?
> 
> In fact that might be useful for todays linux-next, too.
> --

also if you enable lockdep, it tracks where irq's got turned off (with
a stacktrace I think) so it would provide some good clues.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/