linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.27-git3: rtl8169 oops and wireless missing symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43e72e890810171424n7c8ac058u4d8e9821d0e2a5eb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:24:21 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To:	"Stefanik Gábor" <netrolller.3d@...il.com>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@....com>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dcbw@...hat.com>,
	"Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27-git3: rtl8169 oops and wireless missing symbols

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Stefanik Gábor <netrolller.3d@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> cfg80211: Unknown parameter `ieee80211_regdom'
>>
>> Ahh this one.. this is the 2 character module parameter you can pass
>> to cfg80211 upon load and this is available only when
>> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY is enabled.
>>
>> I still don't see why you are seeing this, as your modprobe command
>> did not pass any module parameter options.. do you have some options
>> for cfg8021 in your distribution place for them on /etc/ somewhere?
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>  Luis
>>
>
> Let me have a guess: /etc/modprobe.d/options:
> options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom="EU"
>
> I also have this in my modprobe options file to avoid having to unload
> all wireless drivers and stack modules, then reload manually. Possibly
> some distros auto-set this based on the country selection. Though I
> agree that CRDA is way neater.

Yeah OK so you can remove this then.

  Luis