[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1224214314.7654.65.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:31:54 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix broken debug output reserve_region_with_split()
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 20:13 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > + * Right now we handle:
> > + *
> > + * - 'F' For symbolic Function descriptor pointers
> > + * - 'S' For Symbolic direct pointers), but this can easily be
> > + * extended in the future (network address types etc).
> > + * - 'R' For a struct resouce pointer, it prints the range of
> > + * addresses (not the name nor the flags)
>
> A little too much cut and paste -- the "easily be extended" bit at 'S'
> doesn't really make sense in the middle of the list.
Right :-)
> > + * Note: The difference between 'S' and 'F' is that on ia64 and ppc64
> > + * function pointers are really function descriptors, which contain a
> > + * pointer the real address.
>
> you cut and pasted Linus's typo too -- "a pointer the real address"
> should probably be "a pointer *TO* the real address"
Ok, I'll wait for more comments before a respin to :-) I'm mostly
wondering whether to use fixed sized format rather than the current
variable size (and pad with zeros).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists