[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810162036510.3438@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
yhlu.kernel@...il.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix broken debug output reserve_region_with_split()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll wait for more comments before a respin to :-) I'm mostly
> wondering whether to use fixed sized format rather than the current
> variable size (and pad with zeros).
Sadly, I think that gcc warns if we were to support %08pR, so we can't
pass down flags.
That said, I don't much like SPECIAL in the flags. We never do that thing.
Doing a git grep for some range printouts, we tend to do things like
[%lx,%lx]
[%x - %x]
[%llx, %llx]
[%016lx - %016lx]
<%016llx-%016llx>
But using "0x%llx" or "%#llx" is very rare. It happens (notably
drivers/pci/setup-res.c), but it's not common.
But it would be kind of nice to be able to do extended flags. Maybe we
could do it with
%p04R
and the 04 would be parsed as flags, the same way we do %04x. And then if
you want the 0x, you can use %p#08R..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists