linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix broken debug output reserve_region_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, rdreier@...co.com,
	Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix broken debug output reserve_region_with_split()

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, David Miller wrote:
> 
> These modifiers are interesting, but wouldn't it be even nicer to just
> pick one output style and use it consistently in kernel messages for
> resources?

Sure, but I don't think we agree on what it would be. And quite frankly, 
it might depend on the resource.

For example, in traditional PCI, PIO resources would easily want to use 
%04x, which MMIO would use %08x. Sure, Linux _allows_ for bigger resources 
(ie you can have even PIO resources with the full 64-bit data), but it's 
not what you'd expect for any traditional stuff, and so it makes sense to 
make PIO resources show as %04x to get the old-fashioned resources shown 
in an expected manner.

We can do it inside the %pR code itself (just look at IORESOURCE_IO vs 
IORESOURCE_MEM), and maybe that's even the right approach. Maybe we want 
to even add flag bits, and show things like "IORESOURCE_PREFETCH" as a 
small marking automatically. But maybe people want to make it explicit.

I dunno. I'd certainly be perfectly happy with having the flags and 
field_width be specified by the resource flags. eg

	flags = ZEROPAD | SMALL;
	fieldwidth = (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? 4 : 8;

or something like that. But would it be acceptable to everybody?

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/