[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081016.222108.13382080.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, rdreier@...co.com,
Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix broken debug output reserve_region_with_split()
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
> I dunno. I'd certainly be perfectly happy with having the flags and
> field_width be specified by the resource flags. eg
>
> flags = ZEROPAD | SMALL;
> fieldwidth = (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? 4 : 8;
>
> or something like that. But would it be acceptable to everybody?
I personally appreciate seeing the full 64-bit address on sparc64,
even for IORESOURCE_IO, and that's helped me debug resource
calculation bugs on more than one occasion in the past.
But that's just me :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists