linux-kernel - Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081018194851.GA2083@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:48:53 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Tobias Frost <tobi@...dtobi.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	debian-arm@...ts.debian.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:46:15AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
> > > So is this a regression?  did it used to work?  If so, when? :)
> > 
> > The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
> > I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger
> > the bug.  So it's not a (recent) regression.
> 
> As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a 
> regression. XFS never worked on arm for me.

You are wrong. 

Our team have experience with XFS on ARM OABI on NAS. It worked fine on
2.6.12, but got broken on 2.6.17.

http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=712

-- 
Regards,  Kirill A. Shutemov
 + Belarus, Minsk
 + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)