linux-kernel - CFS related question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081018200319.GC8188@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:03:19 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: CFS related question

Hi Ingo, Peter,

I just curious, look we have the following

static struct sched_entity *pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
	struct sched_entity *se = NULL;

	if (first_fair(cfs_rq)) {
		se = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
		se = pick_next(cfs_rq, se);
		set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
	}

	return se;
}

which I presume may return NULL so the following piece
could fail

static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
{
	struct task_struct *p;
	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
	struct sched_entity *se;

	if (unlikely(!cfs_rq->nr_running))
		return NULL;

	do {
-->		se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
--> OOPs	cfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se);
	} while (cfs_rq);

	p = task_of(se);
	hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);

	return p;
}

Did I miss something? Or it comepletely can NOT happen?

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/