linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> confusion between 2.4.37 and 2.6.27. I have already tagged kernels with 
> wrong versions, having to fix by hand afterwards. It's really cumbersome 
> some times.

But this is only because you are maintaining a source code that is several 
years old, right? Would maintaining a series numbered 2002.x.y make your 
situation a lot better? Do you think you'd never make typo '2002 instead 
of 2006' any more?

Or how would you distingiush the kernel tree you are maintaing from the 
one Linus is maintaining?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/