linux-kernel - Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:11:14 +0200
From:	Tobias Frost <tobi@...dtobi.de>
To:	Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@...ian.org>
Cc:	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, debian-arm@...ts.debian.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

I tried xfs both on the old and new ABI.
(my first try was Jan 2008, old ABI) 
ASAIR at kernel version 2.6.18

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:46 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
> > > So is this a regression?  did it used to work?  If so, when? :)
> > 
> > The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
> > I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger
> > the bug.  So it's not a (recent) regression.
> 
> As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a 
> regression. XFS never worked on arm for me.
> 
> If you need tests on old ABI just tell me.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/