[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FC45CD.1070101@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:48:13 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@...fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
>> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
>>
>
> Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> readability might be a good thing here.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
>
Hi, Ingo
Do you have any objections against these patches?
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: remove exported symbol marker_probe_cb_noarg()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: let marker_table be close to its comments
My new patch are being made on the top of these patches.
new patch:
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: new callbacks manager
new patch remove a lot code and speed up critical region
and not change any APIs.
new patch change too much code, so I have to wait until all known
patches(which can be applied) have been applied.
Thanks, Lai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists