lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:07:43 +0100 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andreas.herrmann3@....com, joseph.cihula@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 10:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > What was not fine for you was to declare tip/auto-iommu-next the 'old' > tree and to request a zapping of linux-next's auto-iommu-next > integration, unilaterally. I didn't ask for it to be removed. Stephen asked if he should remove it, and given my conversation with Thomas I said that I _believe_ that was the plan. After all, the old tree already didn't seem to exist any more, even though there were outstanding patches which need to be merged. But I made sure I didn't give a definitive answer to Stephen's question, and I made sure you and Thomas were both on Cc when I said it. If that was offensive to you, then I apologise. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists