[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1224493663.6770.1538.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:07:43 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andreas.herrmann3@....com,
joseph.cihula@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 10:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> What was not fine for you was to declare tip/auto-iommu-next the 'old'
> tree and to request a zapping of linux-next's auto-iommu-next
> integration, unilaterally.
I didn't ask for it to be removed. Stephen asked if he should remove it,
and given my conversation with Thomas I said that I _believe_ that was
the plan. After all, the old tree already didn't seem to exist any more,
even though there were outstanding patches which need to be merged. But
I made sure I didn't give a definitive answer to Stephen's question, and
I made sure you and Thomas were both on Cc when I said it.
If that was offensive to you, then I apologise.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists