linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] agp patches for 2.6.28-rc1.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200810200358.52147.andres@anarazel.de>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:58:51 +0200
From:	Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] agp patches for 2.6.28-rc1.

Hi,

On Monday 20 October 2008 03:35:21 Keith Packard wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 03:00 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hm. But still, there is at least one distribution (ubuntu intrepid) which
> > will propably will ship 2.4.1 in its stable version soon (it seems
> > unlikely that they will update to an unstable version just before an
> > release).
> We can backport the fix (it's tiny) to the 2.4 2D driver.
Its basically only this, right?

diff --git a/src/i830_driver.c b/src/i830_driver.c
index c1d61f4..eaf5d27 100644
--- a/src/i830_driver.c
+++ b/src/i830_driver.c
@@ -502,8 +502,8 @@ I830DetectMemory(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn)
    range = gtt_size + 4;
 
    /* new 4 series hardware has seperate GTT stolen with GFX stolen */
-   if (IS_G4X(pI830))
-       range = 0;
+   if (IS_G4X(pI830) || IS_GM45(pI830))
+       range = 4;
 
    if (IS_I85X(pI830) || IS_I865G(pI830) || IS_I9XX(pI830)) {
       switch (gmch_ctrl & I855_GMCH_GMS_MASK) {

Barring that I have absolutely idea about the code and all related stuff, do I 
see it correct, that this also will result in problems if the kernel doesn't 
have the related fix?

> > Which means, that this driver will get quite some spread...
> > Is it accepted that the kernel abi breaks that radically/fast?
> We tested a pile of hardware and didn't find any GM45s that worked, so
> we assumed they were all broken and that fixing the bug wouldn't cause
> any working configurations to stop working.
Seems sensible from your side.

> We can hack up the kernel so the old X server just gets a WARN_ON
> instead of breaking. This is a bit worrying though; the "fix" would let
> user space continue to mis-program the hardware.
If its really only a that small portion of hardware... At least the T500/T400 
series, containing the same hw as mine, from Lenovo propably is not yet really 
wide spread (Laptop is 4weeks old or so and wasn't available before).

> My concern here is that a common failure mode with this bug was to lock
> up the graphics hardware and require a reboot. Having the X server fail
> to start and leave the system in text mode where new packages can be
> installed seems like a better mode than making the system hang during
> boot.
Right.

Andres
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/