[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081020163108.GA1035@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:31:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: separate ftrace from ftrace
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> There has been a lot of confusion between ftrace the infrastructure
> and ftrace the function tracer within ftrace. Developers have added
> dependencies on HAVE_FTRACE when they did not need to. The HAVE_FTRACE
> was the architecture supported the function tracer.
>
> This patch series renames the ftrace function tracer to just that,
> FUNCTION_TRACER. And even renames the tracer shown to users from
> 'ftrace' to 'function'.
>
> Now, when referring to ftrace, it means the ftrace infrastructure, and
> when referring to the function trace, it is now called the function
> tracer.
>
> The second patch cause a lot of files to be touched. Mostly Makefiles
> and Kconfig files. As well as default configs.
applied the following bits to tip/tracing/ftrace:
3ce83ae: ftrace: rename the ftrace tracer to function
606576c: ftrace: rename FTRACE to FUNCTION_TRACER
c2db805: ftrace: fix depends
bd95b88: ftrace: release functions from hash
c513867: ftrace: do not enclose logic in WARN_ON
thanks Steve! I left out the defconfig bits - out of sync symbol names
there do not hurt, and those files are high-flux anyway and generally
updated by the arch maintainers regularly.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists