linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:36:16 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Louis.Rilling@...labs.com
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Andrey Mirkin <major@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:10 +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> To be fair, and since (IIRC) the initial intent was to start with OpenVZ's
> approach, shouldn't Oren answer the same questions with respect to Andrey's
> patchset?

I'm only really "supporting" Oren's patch set because he got it out way
before the OpenVZ one showed up, and has kept integrating improvements
into it to keep me interested.  The OpenVZ approach does a few things
that Oren's does not, and it *is* a bit more mature.

I'm quite willing to jump camps if there's something compelling in what
Andrey has posted, even though I've put quite a bit of time in to
reviewing and improving Oren's.  I'm looking for that "something". :)

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/