linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] Make checkpoint/restart functionality modular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081020165938.GB25885@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:59:38 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrey Mirkin <major@...nvz.org>
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Make checkpoint/restart functionality modular

Quoting Andrey Mirkin (major@...nvz.org):
> A config option CONFIG_CHECKPOINT is introduced.
> New structure cpt_operations is introduced to store pointers to
> checkpoint/restart functions from module.

I thought we had decided not to use a kernel module?

Louis' comments on your patch 8 regarding module pinning suggests that
details about using a module will detract from proper review of the core
c/r functionality...

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/