lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:13:05 +0400 From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@...il.com> To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org> Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>, xfs@....sgi.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) 2008/10/20 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:58:09PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote: >> Hi Christoph >> >> I have the same result with next-1020 and today's xfs-2.6.git/master >> ( >> commit bfd2bd10da76378dc4afd87d7d204a1d3d70b347 >> Author: David Chinner <david@...morbit.com> >> Date: Fri Oct 17 15:36:23 2008 +1000 >> Inode: Allow external list initialisation >> ) Ha, that kernel (xfs/master) has made my system dead locked. SysRQ-d: Show all locks held in the system 1 lock held by pdflush (&type->s_umount_key#18{----}, at writeback_inodes 1 lock held by login (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----} at xfs_ilock and so on ( many locks at xfs_ilock) >> >> Should I start bisecting? > > That would be extremely helpful! > > > And as mentioned in the other mail I still can't reproduce it, but I can > currently only test on x86-32, not x86-64. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists