[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4423d670810201013w6448cb38w402771799cefb5f5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:13:05 +0400
From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)
2008/10/20 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:58:09PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> Hi Christoph
>>
>> I have the same result with next-1020 and today's xfs-2.6.git/master
>> (
>> commit bfd2bd10da76378dc4afd87d7d204a1d3d70b347
>> Author: David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
>> Date: Fri Oct 17 15:36:23 2008 +1000
>> Inode: Allow external list initialisation
>> )
Ha, that kernel (xfs/master) has made my system dead locked.
SysRQ-d:
Show all locks held in the system
1 lock held by pdflush
(&type->s_umount_key#18{----}, at writeback_inodes
1 lock held by login
(&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----} at xfs_ilock
and so on ( many locks at xfs_ilock)
>>
>> Should I start bisecting?
>
> That would be extremely helpful!
>
>
> And as mentioned in the other mail I still can't reproduce it, but I can
> currently only test on x86-32, not x86-64.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists