linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081020173545.GB3161@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:35:45 -0400
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:59:04PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's tree will not build for powerpc allyesconfig (libc aborts the
> link due to a free() problem), sparc(32) defconfig and probably some
> other configurations.
> 

hmmm...yeah, on x86_64 i've hit:

  CC [M]  net/9p/protocol.o
  LD [M]  net/9p/9pnet.o
  LD [M]  net/9p/9pnet_virtio.o
  Building modules, stage 2.
  MODPOST 1616 modules
ERROR: "p9_debug_level" [net/9p/9pnet.ko] undefined!


seems to be resolved by this simple patch:


Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>


diff --git a/net/9p/protocol.c b/net/9p/protocol.c
index 29be524..ebf819e 100644
--- a/net/9p/protocol.c
+++ b/net/9p/protocol.c
@@ -542,8 +542,10 @@ int p9pdu_finalize(struct p9_fcall *pdu)
 	err = p9pdu_writef(pdu, 0, "d", size);
 	pdu->size = size;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_9P_DEBUG
 	if ((p9_debug_level & P9_DEBUG_PKT) == P9_DEBUG_PKT)
 		p9pdu_dump(0, pdu);
+#endif
 
 	P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_9P, ">>> size=%d type: %d tag: %d\n", pdu->size,
 							pdu->id, pdu->tag);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/