linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1224488603.23068.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:43:23 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To:	Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Coady <grant_lkml@...o.com.au>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than
	120 seconds"

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 08:51 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> 
> On 2008/10/20 08:27, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> wrote:
> > The issue I see still occurs well before those changesets. I have
> > seen it with v2.6.25 but v2.6.24 survived for 7 days without issue
> > (my threshold for a good kernel is 7 days, hence bisecting is a bit
> > slow...).
> 
> Hello Ian,
> 
> it seems we're hunting down different bugs after all.  Too bad, I
> hoped I could have solved your problem, too.

Thanks anyway, I'll just keep on bisecting ;-)

>   Our machine has been
> running well over the weekend with the patch I posted; with faulty
> kernels, the problem would occur after a few minutes.
> 
-- 
Ian Campbell

BOFH excuse #400:

We are Microsoft.  What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an undocumented feature.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)