[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FD96C9.6060204@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:46:01 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: roel kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
CC: linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: unsigned irq_base cannot be negative
Hi,
roel kluin :
> unsigned irq_base cannot be negative
Indeed. Thanks for taking this point !
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> index f8d0a57..f93f57a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> @@ -857,12 +857,12 @@ static int __init atmel_lcdfb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto stop_clk;
> }
>
> - sinfo->irq_base = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (sinfo->irq_base < 0) {
> + ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to get irq\n");
> - ret = sinfo->irq_base;
> goto stop_clk;
> }
> + sinfo->irq_base = ret;
I prefer changing the definition of irq_base to plain int.
So the patch becomes obvious:
- unsigned long irq_base;
+ int irq_base;
What do you think of this ?
I repost a patch addressing this issue.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists