[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FE00A9.6010400@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:17:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Get TSC frequency from VMware hypervisor.
Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> Hi hpa,
>
> Do you mean we should have a x86_hyper_vendor field in cpuinfo_x86 ?
> Even with that, i think we will have to differentiate between each of
> the hypervisors, as each of the hypervisor implementation differs in how
> they provide the TSC frequency.
>
> So we would end up with code like,
> if (boot_cpu.x86_hyper_vendor == VMWARE)
> get_frequency_vmware_way();
> if (boot_cpu.x86_hyper_vendor == XXX)
> get_frequency_XXX_way();
>
> I agree that having a field in the cpu structure will make sure that we
> don't end up calling vmware_platform multiple times, but does it help in
> this particular situation ?
>
> Let me know if you meant something else.
>
That's exactly what I mean. I want the detection centralized, and no,
with only one user it doesn't make much difference, but there won't be
just one user.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists