linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] pending scheduler updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081021173529.GG11679@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:05:29 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pending scheduler updates

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Please apply
> 
> applied these to tip/sched/urgent:
> 
>  f9c0b09: sched: revert back to per-rq vruntime
>  a4c2f00: sched: fair scheduler should not resched rt tasks
>  ffda12a: sched: optimize group load balancer
> 
> (will wait with 4/4 until you and Mike come to a verdict.)

Is there any conclusion on Patch 4/4? It looks sane to me!

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/