[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1224615681.661.3.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:01:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: henrik@...tad.us
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:45 +0200, henrik@...tad.us wrote:
> From: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@...il.com>
>
> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
> not set.
While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
as to not create an additional ifdef?
Thanks
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c226c7b..9e0e33c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -898,8 +898,9 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
> -
> +#endif
> void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
>
> struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists