[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FE5416.9070402@tremplin-utc.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:13:42 +0200
From: Eric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...e.cz, burman.yan@...il.com,
pau@...ack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LIS3LV02Dx Accelerometer driver (take 4)
Andrew Morton schreef:
>> +static void lis3lv02d_poweroff_timeout(unsigned long data)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_lis3lv02d *dev = (void *)data;
>> +
>> + up(&dev->poff_sem);
>> + lis3lv02d_poweroff(dev->device->handle);
>> + down(&dev->poff_sem);
>
> eek, no, we cannot down a semaphore from a timer handler! It will lead
> to might_sleep() warnings, scheduling-in-atomic warnings and kernel
> deadlocks.
Ooh... What happened is that I wrote the other functions first. They
indirectly use acpi_evaluate_integer(), which can sleep. So I avoided
spin_locks, and decided to use a semaphore. But now there is a semaphore
in a timer (which is not allowed to sleep).
It seems the semaphore usage is compulsory due to acpi, so I'm planning
to change the timer into a scheduled work on a workqueue (with
queue_delayed_work(), and cancel_delayed_work_sync()). This workqueue
could be the same as the one for the joystick input. Does that look the
right way to do it?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists