[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FE62A0.7080202@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:15:44 +0100
From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
To: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
Alex Riesen wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>:
>> There are 16 patches in the patch set, and the patches are against the
>> latest linux-next tree (linux 2.6.27-next-20081016).
>
> You better don't base anything off linux-next. These are not stable: there
> can be even something in the tree you mentioned which will never end
> up in the mainline and if your patches depend on it they wont apply to
> something like v2.6.26.2.
Definately, there's some d_obtain_alias stuff in linux-next which has
been there since linux-2.6.27-rc4-next. I thought it would make it into
the final 2.6.27 but it didn't.
I thought linux-next *was* the tree that new patches should be based
off. However, the relationship between linux-2.6.git, linux-next.git,
and the -mm patch series seems to be a little vague to me, not to
mention where the linux-staging tree fits into all this.
Phillip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists