[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081022083141.GB22344@brain>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:31:41 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp
Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: */ in string confuses checkpatch.pl
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:56:17AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:57:26AM +0900, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > The below code confuses checkpatch.pl ver 0.21.
> >
> > Regards.
> > ----------
> > # cat /tmp/foo.c
> > void foo(void)
> > {
> > bar(\" /proc/\\\\*/\");
> > bar(\" /proc/\\\\$/\");
> > }
> > # /usr/src/vanilla/linux-2.6.27.2/scripts/checkpatch.pl --file /tmp/foo.c
> > ERROR: need consistent spacing around \'/\' (ctx:WxV)
> > #4: FILE: tmp/foo.c:4:
> > + bar(\" /proc/\\\\$/\");
> > ^
> >
> > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 5 lines checked
> >
> > /tmp/foo.c has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> > are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> > CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Ok, I can see whats happened here. Most of these \'s are extraneous.
Without those I can reproduce this. Its a bug in the 'comment is open
at the start of hunk' detection. I think I have updated this heuristic
to cope wit this. Could you try your original patch (I assume there was
one) with the version below:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing
Thanks for your report.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists