linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 72/80] tty: fix up gigaset a bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081022100045.2f06e977@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:00:45 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hansjoerg Lipp <hjlipp@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 72/80] tty: fix up gigaset a bit

> additional test_bit(TTY_IO_ERROR, &tty->flags) would catch a case that
> would otherwise be handled incorrectly?

Fiddling with tty->disc_data by hand probably currently does the right
thing. I don't guarantee it will continue to do so after the BKL removal
gets to ldisc setting.

> So I think removing the poll method is the right thing to do. If you
> have no objections, I'll submit a patch doing just that. (Hoping to
> still make it for the .28 merge window.)

If you really don't need the poll then it can go - for 2.6.29. The
current code isn't wrong on a functional level it just returns unexpected
results in the unplug case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/