linux-kernel - Re: __vm_enough_memory(), OVERCOMMIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6689.1224674779@jrobl>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:26:19 +0900
From:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: __vm_enough_memory(), OVERCOMMIT_NEVER, current->mm, kernel thread 


Alan Cox:
> No - the shmem routine would use vm_enough_memory_fs which wouldn't care
> if current->mm is NULL, but the others would check.

Unfortunately I cannot imagine what new vm_enough_memory_fs() will be.
Would you show me its draft or pseudo code?


Junjiro R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/