linux-kernel - e1000e fails after several S3 resumes (2.6.26 Debian, TP T60)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1Ksdli-0005Os-MP@approx.mit.edu>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:28:58 -0400
From:	Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@....EDU>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: e1000e fails after several S3 resumes (2.6.26 Debian, TP T60)

Once in a while after resuming from S3 sleep, the Ethernet driver
gets confused, whereupon dhcp'ing for an IP address fails, e.g.

  /* doing the dhcp: */
  Listening on LPF/eth0/00:16:41:52:50:de
  Sending on   LPF/eth0/00:16:41:52:50:de
  Sending on   Socket/fallback
  DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7
  /* and so on with various intervals */

I workaround it with

  modprobe -rv e1000e ; modprobe -v e1000e
(the '-v' options to make sure the module does vanish and return)

and then try again to get an address, which works.  A similar failure
mode happens with the iwl3945 driver (and a similar workaround usually
succeeds).

How can I debug this issue the next time that it happens (it's about
once every two weeks)?  Using 'ethtool' or 'lspci -vvvv'?

  $ uname -a
  Linux approx 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 15:18:09 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

It's Debian unstable's kernel 2.6.26 based on 2.6.26.4.  The laptop is a
Thinkpad T60 whose network controllers are given by lspci as

  02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
  03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection (rev 02)

Could it be caused by the kernel (and modules) getting upgraded
underneath a running system?  In which case I'll just 'not do that
again' as the simplest fix, and reboot after a kernel upgrade.  My
installed kernel is based on 2.6.26.6, but the running kernel is based
on 2.6.26.4 [where based on means 'with Debian's patches'].

Please CC me on any responses.

-Sanjoy

`Until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always
 glorify the hunters.'  --African Proverb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/