linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:35:30 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers

[Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:28:14AM -0700]
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
>> Please check -- wouldn't it be better to use such a macro?
>
> Looks good. But could you rename OO_MAX to something different? There is  
> already s->max which may cause confusion because s->max is the maximum  
> number of objects in a slab. OO_MAX is the maximum mask?
>

I supposed it would mean maximum object number inside page (ie quantity) which
is happen to be the same value as OO_MASK. Maybe OO_MAX_OBJ?

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/