[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FF5933.3080501@lwfinger.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:47:47 -0700
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
CC: Jouni Malinen <jouni.malinen@...eros.com>,
wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-git from commit 43ac2ca3840f64
Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:01:14AM -0700, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>> On my x86_64 system, the mainline 2.6.27-git kernel (v2.6.27-6030-g6da0b38)
>> shows the following anomaly with the 'iwlist scan' command:
>>
>> Cell 03 - Address: 00:14:BF:85:49:FA
>> ESSID:"lwfdjf"
>> Mode:Master
>> Channel:1
>> Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1)
>> Quality=66/100 Signal level:-62 dBm Noise level=-68 dBm
>> Encryption key:on
>> IE: Unknown: 00066C7766646A66
>
> ...
>
>> This problem was bisected to commit 43ac2ca3840f64f699a239535c590fa7ebaaac27,
>> entitled "mac80211: Handle scan result IEs in one block". The same bug is
>> present in the wireless-testing tree.
>
> Problem? Bug? This is by design. What does not work for you?
When a utility starts spitting messages that it doesn't understand what the
kernel is providing _AND_ the commit message does not mention that this will
happen, can someone be blamed for thinking it is a bug?
Clearly this is not a regression. Are there plans to update the wireless utilities?
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists