[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810220958.23266.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:58:22 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: eranian@...il.com
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/24] perfmon3: introduction
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:39 am stephane eranian wrote:
> As you know, I have been involved with this project for quite some time
> now. I have been through many ups and downs trying to get this merged
> upstream. So rest assured of my full determination to bring this to the
> point of success.
I've been following this at a high level since using perfmon on ia64 several
years ago. I have to say I'm impressed that you've put up with all the review
and code churn (which to me often seemed arbitrary) without burning out.
Honestly I think it sucks that perfmonN isn't upstream yet supporting all the
various architectures you've been working with. You've obviously proven to be
a much more responsive and end-user focused maintainer than several of the
other fly by night profiling infrastructures we currently have in the kernel
(the long abandoned oprofile and perfctr come to mind).
As I mentioned at KS, I think it's about time we had a single point of contact
for profiling in the kernel, to avoid the massive functional duplication we
have today and make sure some kind of code sharing occurs; seems to me you'd
be a good candidate for that sort of job.
But regardless, I think it's about time this got merged. Linus? Andrew?
Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists