linux-kernel - Sending patches, against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48FEAD30.3090906@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:33:52 +0100
From:	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
CC:	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Sending patches, against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what?

Hi,

I'm about to send another respin of the Squashfs patches.  Do I base 
them against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what?  I thought they 
should be against linux-next, but I've already got one complaint.  So, 
I'm confused, what tree should new patches be based off?

Any advice would be useful.

Thanks

Phillip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/