linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] byteorder: remove direct includes of linux/byteorder/swab[b].h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:43:00 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] byteorder: remove direct includes of
 linux/byteorder/swab[b].h

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:15:34 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, this hunk seems to have been lost when you sent it to Linus, it's possible
> > you applied this on top of the -next tree where this file has moved, but the tests
> > tree hasn't been pulled yet.
> > 
> > The rest of the patch went into mainline as 1d8cca44b6a244b7e378546d719041819049a0f9
> > 
> 
> Grump.  It happens sometimes.  People putting stuff into linux-next and
> then not merging it into the next kernel.

The "tests" tree has been requested to be pulled twice (or so) with no
response apparently, so I have now dropped it from the -next tree until
someone decides if we want to integrate it at all.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped