[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810221516410.25759@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
sagar.abhishek@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] ftrace: only have ftrace_kill atomic
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:43:18 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > Only have a way to completely disable ftrace in atomic sections.
> >
>
> I have NFI what that means.
>
> More importantly there is no explanation for *why* this change is being
> made.
Sorry, I'll explain it better in the next release. This was just something
that Ingo wanted cleaned up. He prefers the name "ftrace_turn_off". I
really don't care what the name is, but the "atomic" part was something
that had to go.
What's your preference fo a name of a function that should completely
disable ftrace on anomaly detection? Unfortunately, ftrace_stop,
ftrace_disable, and ftrace_shutdown are already in use.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists