[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081022122654.744d9e85.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:26:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
sagar.abhishek@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] ftrace: comment arch ftrace code
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > Also, I hope that the above code is called from within a
> > pagefault_disable()d region? Or are relying upon some magical
> > side-effect of something which happens to do the same thing as
> > pagefault_disable()? IOW: by what means does the above code ensure
> > that do_page_fault() will see in_atomic()==true?
>
> This code is called from kstop_machine, or simply has interrupts disabled.
in_atomic() doesn't test irqs_disabled()!
Still, probe_kernel_write() correctly handles the
secret-argument-passing to do_page_fault().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists