linux-kernel - Re: PATCH] [ConfigFS]: Extend CONFIGFS_ATTR_STRUCT() and CONFIGFS_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081022221358.GA7621@mail.oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:13:58 -0700
From:	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-iSCSI.org Target Dev" 
	<linux-iscsi-target-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH] [ConfigFS]: Extend CONFIGFS_ATTR_STRUCT() and
	CONFIGFS_ATTR_OPS() macros

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:06:29PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> What do you think..?
> 
> Also, here is the drivers/lio-core/iscsi_target_configfs.c commit to
> convert to use to new parameters for CONFIGFS_ATTR_STRUCT() and
> CONFIGFS_ATTR_OPS():

	It seems even more complex, and inconsistent with what sysfs
and other users do.  Can you give me an example of using it?

Joel

-- 

"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything
 that counts can be counted."
        - Albert Einstein 

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/