lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:46:21 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] work_on_cpu: use on
	x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c

On 10/23, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> +static int __cpuinit detect_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	int			retval;
> +
> +	if (num_cache_leaves == 0)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	per_cpu(cpuid4_info, cpu) = kzalloc(
> +	    sizeof(struct _cpuid4_info) * num_cache_leaves, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (per_cpu(cpuid4_info, cpu) == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	retval = work_on_cpu(cpu, get_cpu_leaves, NULL);

This doesn't look right.

cache_add_dev()->cpuid4_cache_sysfs_init()->detect_cache_attributes()
is called by CPU_ONLINE under cpu_hotplug_begin(), this is deadlockable.

Yes, the caller (cpu_hotplug.active_writer) can safely take
get_online_cpus(), but if we have another pending work which needs
get_online_cpus(), we have the deadlock.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ