linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/35] cpumask: deprecate any_online_cpu() in favour of cpumask_any/cpumask_any_and From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:57:09 -0700
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/35] cpumask: deprecate any_online_cpu() in favour of
 cpumask_any/cpumask_any_and From: Rusty Russell	<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
>> any_online_cpu() is a good name, but it takes a cpumask_t, not a
>> pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> 
> almost all the patches have a missing \n and thus wrong authorship...
> 
> 	Ingo

Hmm, that's strange.  It might be the way quilt mail gathers everything up
into mbox format.  I'll experiment a little bit to see what's causing it.
(This is the first time I've used the From: line as well as subject lines
w/o Subject: preceeding them.)

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/