[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081023061719.3ae5b090@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:17:19 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get rid if __cpuinit and __cpuexit
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:21:43 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:30:54PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] get rid if __cpuinit and __cpuexit
>
> Aiee!
>
> Was something said about __devinit/__devexit ?
one at a time ;-)
but seriously, I do want to look at that one too. But it's the last one
on the list, the meminit ones come next as "obscure and complex"
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists