linux-kernel - Re: SLUB defrag pull request?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020810230658o7c6b3651k2d671aab09aa71fb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:58:53 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
	hugh@...itas.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: SLUB defrag pull request?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Solid? What is not solid? The SLUB design was made in part because of the
> defrag problems that were not easy to solve with SLAB. The ability to lock
> down a slab allows stabilizing objects. We discussed solutions to the
> fragmentation problem for years and did not get anywhere with SLAB.

I'd assume he's talking about the Intel-reported regression that's yet
to be resolved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/