[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020810230714g7f5d36bas812ad691140ee453@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:14:41 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
hugh@...itas.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: SLUB defrag pull request?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Got a draft of a patch here that does freelist handling differently. Instead
> of building linked lists it uses free objects to build arrays of pointers to
> free objects. That improves cache cold free behavior since the object
> contents itself does not have to be touched on free.
>
> The problem looks like its freeing objects on a different processor that
> where it was used last. With the pointer array it is only necessary to touch
> the objects that contain the arrays.
Interesting. SLAB gets away with this because of per-cpu caches or
because it uses the bufctls instead of a freelist?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists