[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:01:14 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask
On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various arch
changes for this reason.
> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>
> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is just
porting the changes across to your tree now.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists