[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490097BF.8050407@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:26:55 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...zero.co.uk>
CC: Robert Moss <robert.von.moss@...il.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Framebuffer issues in 2.6.26 with uvesafb and vesafb. Linux is
about choice!
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2008 12:21:09 Robert Moss wrote:
>> I also want to note, that I downloaded 2.6.27.3 and compiled, with
>> CONFIG_FB_VESA=Y, and still get excactly the same response as from
>> 2.6.26
>
> Useful info, and I checked your configs and they enable the right options.
> Looks like you've found a real bug.
>
> IIRC, a lot of real mode assembler (including the x86 vga/vesa stuff, iirc)
> was rewritten a year or so ago, in C. This might have been the time that this
> bug was introduced. I've added hpa to CC since I believe he was the author of
> these changes.
>
> (Summary of the original report is that vga= vesa mode selection seems to have
> broken for Robert since at least 2.6.26, and after 2.6.24. From what I can see
> he has the right vesafb options enabled.)
>
That happend in 2.6.23 I believe, so that would be unrelated.
The best would be to bisect the regression. The second best would be if
he could run the "vesainfo" program from the Syslinux distribution (it's
a pre-boot program that dumps information on the VESA stack). The third
best would be to set up Xorg to run the "vesa" driver, and send
/var/log/Xorg.0.log.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists