[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4900A5CA.5070107@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:26:50 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Henroid, Andrew D" <andrew.d.henroid@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i7300_idle driver v1.55
> Suppose that one of the idle CPUs takes an interrupt, whose handler
> accesses the module being removed. How is this handled?
We're just talking about idle notifier code here. Interrupts shouldn't
ever call idle notifiers directly.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists