linux-kernel - Re: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081023184906.GA2612@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:49:06 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?

[Gautham R Shenoy - Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:51:19PM +0530]
| On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:02:12PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
| > Hmm. arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:do_boot_cpu() can deadlock ?
| > 
| > It is called from _cpu_up() under cpu_hotplug_begin(), and it
| > waits for c_idle.work. Again, if we have the pending work which
| > needs get_online_cpus() we seem to have problems.
| 
| Good point. Though this code gets triggered mostly during boot time when
| the CPUs are being brought online for the first time. If we have some
| work-item pending at that time, which needs get_online_cpus(), we could
| possibly see this deadlock.
| 
| > 
| > Oleg.
| 
| -- 
| Thanks and Regards
| gautham
| 

May I ask? If I understand right we do use this part of do_boot_cpu

	if (!keventd_up() || current_is_keventd())
		c_idle.work.func(&c_idle.work);
	else {
		schedule_work(&c_idle.work);
		wait_for_completion(&c_idle.done);
	}

if only we've been called the first time after power on. And all
subsequent call of this do_boot_cpu would lead to

	if (c_idle.idle) {
		c_idle.idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long) (((struct pt_regs *)
			(THREAD_SIZE +  task_stack_page(c_idle.idle))) - 1);
		init_idle(c_idle.idle, cpu);
		goto do_rest;
	}

ie go to do_rest and no wait_for_completion/schedule_work at all.
Did I miss something? *Sorry* in advance if the question is quite
not related. This work-pending situation is in 'possible' scenario
only (ie we don't have such a callers for now... yet)?

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/